nanog mailing list archives
Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:09:25 +0200
I've been trying to collect the info about services (including ISPs and transit providers) and products (software and hardware) that "say" they offer IPv6 (still in the phase of verifying one by one, but almost done !). Is still not complete, but I think provides a good picture. http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/ Just a few examples: You can type ISP in the free search box, or TLD, or load balancer. Regards, Jordi
De: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org> Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu> Fecha: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Para: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> CC: <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones". Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something. Which is not particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone".Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data? Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers? -Don
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), (continued)
- Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) bmanning (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Perry Lorier (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Tony Hain (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 30)
- dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 30)
- Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] Donald Stahl (May 30)
- Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] Merike Kaeo (May 30)
- Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- Re: dual-stack simon (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 30)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Tony Hain (May 30)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Mark Tinka (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Valdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 29)
- Testing IPv6 support on th client's machine (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 30)
- Re: Testing IPv6 support on the client's machine (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 30)