nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:21:08 -0400 (EDT)
There is something to be said for not being able to blindly spew worm traffic and still expect to get a sensible hit ratio as with IPv4.but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not)Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it?was the ":)" not enough: "I'm joking" ??Just askin', ya know?some people do think that it does... they would be wrong, but they don't know that.
-Don
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Valdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Adrian Chadd (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted William B. Norton (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joe Greco (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 27)