nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
I understand the problems but I think there are clear cut cases where /48's make sense- a large scale anycast DNS provider would seem to be a good candidate for a /48 and I would hope it would get routed. Then again that might be the only sensible reason...That said- ARIN is handing out /48's- should we be blocking validly assigned networks?your network might have to to protect it's valuable routing slots. There are places in the v4 world where /24's are not carried either. So, as Bill said just cause you get an allocation doesn't mean you can assure routability of it everywhere.
-Don
Current thread:
- IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Pekka Savola (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Dale W. Carder (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Pekka Savola (May 28)