nanog mailing list archives
RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: "Krichbaum, Eric" <Eric.Krichbaum () admin citynet net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 14:24:32 -0400
Agreed. The statement from ARIN is recent and impacts us all. We've got our core v6 routing in place, but operationally, that's really the easy part. Modifying the tools such as billing, monitoring, management, tracking, and auditting are the slow link in the chain. The space is dwindling but that doesn't seem to be putting the transition pressure on if the services aren't there to use v6. Until more transit providers support it, the reasoning for smaller provider to transition is limited. Eric Krichbaum, PhD Director Network Engineering, Citynet -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Steven M. Bellovin Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 11:31 AM To: Randy Bush Cc: Martin Hannigan; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted On Sat, 26 May 2007 00:39:19 -0400 Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
you have something new and interesting about ipv6? if so, did you submit?
Given the ARIN statement, I think it's time for more discussion of v6 migration, transition, and operations issues. No, I'm not volunteering; I'm not running a v6 network. I suspect that Martin is right -- the program committee should be proactive on this topic and seek out presenters. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- NANOG 40 agenda posted Steve Feldman (May 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 25)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 25)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 25)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Steven M. Bellovin (May 26)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Krichbaum, Eric (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kevin Day (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 26)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Martin Hannigan (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar (May 27)