nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history.
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:33:20 -0400
On 24-May-2007, at 03:42, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
Earlier today I had an issue where a circuit to one of my two BGP connected upstreams went away for an hour or so. During this period, I expected BGP to act as expected and migrate the traffic to the second circuit with a second provider. This did not occur.
When this has happened to me before, I have been suspicious about whether the upstream to whom the circuit broke was routing my nets down the dead circuit with static routes that for whatever reason (layer-2 obfuscation, etc) didn't go away when the link went down.
This hasn't always been the answer, but sometimes it has; in several cases poking about within RIS (or interactively through a route-views router while the circuit was down) revealed that upstream in question was originating routes on my behalf while the circuit was down.
Joe
Current thread:
- BGP announce/withdrawal history. Forrest W. Christian (May 24)
- RE: BGP announce/withdrawal history. Neil J. McRae (May 24)
- Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history. Erik Romijn (May 24)
- Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history. Peter Walker (May 24)
- Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history. Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history. Joe Abley (May 24)