nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: Per Heldal <heldal () eml cc>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:47:56 +0200
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 12:43 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Well then - all you need is to have some way to convince registrars take down scammer domains fast.
It should be the registries responsibility to keep their registrars in line. If they fail to do so their delegation should be transferred elsewhere. Of course, to impose decent rules you'd need a root-operator whose primary goal is to act in the community's best interest with contractual terms subject to public scrutiny. You'd have to make some real draconian rules not to have anybody wanting to operate popular TLDs. Was DNS designed as a tool for internet-protocol users, or was it intended as a mechanism to distribute access to revenue-sources? //per
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Douglas Otis (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Kradorex Xeron (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Steve Atkins (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Per Heldal (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures John LaCour (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Hank Nussbacher (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Mark Andrews (May 21)