![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8
From: Harald Koch <chk () pobox com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:57:38 -0400
Neal R wrote:
The last time I looked into this there wasn't anything being done with the block, but now I see lots of people assigned to do various things - should have looked before I said anything, but in 2001 this was totally dead, at least in Iowa/Nebraska.
I've had an address for considerably longer than that :)To answer the original poster: net 44 generally isn't directly routable to the Internet, because there are severe restrictions on the kind of traffic that can be carried over ham radio bands. net 44 is intended to be an internet constructed using radio links. However, there are several gateways, and net 44 currently uses several tunnels over the Internet backbones to join geographically separated radio networks. There's a whole lot of stuff going on there (including some IP addressable satellites).
-- Harald
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Jason Frisvold (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Neal R (May 21)
- Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Andy Brezinsky (May 21)
- OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Neal R (May 21)
- Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Harald Koch (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Joel Jaeggli (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures John Curran (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 22)