nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:49:16 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Roger Marquis wrote:
Except that there's a lot more to this pattern than simply changing NS at a rate other than normal, enough that it can be easily identified for what it is.
I'm not in the mood to argue, but 'do tell'. Perhaps someone from ICANN will implement this in policy for the TLD folks to use.
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Joe Abley (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Simon Waters (May 21)
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Edward Lewis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Crist Clark (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Paul Vixie (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)