nanog mailing list archives
Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law.
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:04:25 +0100
Nothing is wrong with what he posted. The guy is a moron. However, I was taking my 15 min of fame to jab at SORBS policy of listing people on their respective lists.
when 42 other folk have similarly whined, i am not sure the word 'fame' is appropriate randy
Current thread:
- Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 16)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Peter Corlett (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Tony Finch (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- RE: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Andrew Kirch (Mar 16)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 16)