nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
This was the whole point in using a separate domain name so that this wouldn't happen. Having said that- I suspect every user in the current v6 Internet could hit his site and still not overwhelm a single server :)If I read the thread so far correctly, Igor can't enable a single server with v6, because the instant he updates the DNS so an MX for his domain references a AAAA, that will become the preferred target for his domain from the entire IPv6 world, and he's gonna need a load balancer from Day 0.
There simply aren't that many of us :) -Don
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Colm MacCarthaigh (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Colm MacCarthaigh (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joe Abley (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Matt Peterson (Jun 05)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Bernhard Schmidt (Jun 04)