nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:12:12 -0400
In ARIN you have a policy to request IPv6 PI. So what is the problem ? Regards, Jordi
De: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch () corp earthlink net> Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu> Fecha: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:37:23 +0000 Para: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>, <owner-nanog () merit edu>, Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org> CC: <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Until there's a practical solution for multihoming, this whole discussion is pretty pointless. -- Sent from my BlackBerry. -----Original Message----- From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:27:33 To:Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org> Cc:nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 On 29 Jun 2007, at 14:24, Donald Stahl wrote:That's the thing .. google's crawlers and search app runs at layer 7, v6 is an addressing system that runs at layer 3. If we'd (the community) got everything right with v6, it wouldn't matter to Google's applications whether the content came from a site hosted on a v4 address, or a v6 address, or even both.If Google does not have v6 connectivity then how are they going to crawl those v6 sites?I think we're debating from very similar positions... v6 isn't the ideal scenario of '96 extra bits for free', because if life was so simple, we wouldn't need to ask this question. Andy
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6), (continued)
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6) Joel Jaeggli (Jun 29)
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6) Nicolás Antoniello (Jun 29)
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6) Stephen Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6) Joel Jaeggli (Jun 29)
- Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6) Steve Gibbard (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 David Conrad (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Nicolás Antoniello (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 David Conrad (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Stephen Sprunk (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Lynda True (aka Etaoin Shrdlu) (Jun 28)
- RE: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Jamie Bowden (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Edward Lewis (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 John Curran (Jun 28)