nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:19:07 -0700
So we should deploy IPv6... I get it. The argument comes up time and time again. I would do it tomorrow - nay, today - if I had an answer to one thing: How the heck do I multihome? I have v6 space from Sprint to play with, but I'm reluctant to use it because I can't multihome with it. The end user doesn't care about 4 vs. 6, or anything we discuss here, all they care is that it *works*. It's all a magic box to them anyway. Businesses care that we can guarantee that it works. I want the same reliability with v6 that I have right now with v4, and single homed v6 isn't going to cut it, nor is some host-based hack, or every host gets a v6 address from each v6 provider, or stupid DNS tricks. Am I crazy to want routers to make the routing decisions? ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Andy Davidson (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Bob Snyder (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Joe Abley (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Stephen Satchell (Jun 29)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 30)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 30)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 30)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Justin M. Streiner (Jun 28)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Colin Johnston (Jun 30)
- Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 28)