nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Advertisements


From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:56:57 +0200


On 1-jun-2007, at 14:58, Chris L. Morrow wrote:

I believe that a separate /48 per site is better regardless of whether or not the company has contracted with a single ISP for all sites, or
not. As far as I am concerned if there is a separate access circuit,
then it is a site and it deserves its own /48 assignment/allocation.

So aggregation is no longer a goal?

why do you say that? he COULD mean that they should get their ip
assignment from their provider, which would/should aggregate for him...
right?

I thought we were talking about PI... Obviously with PA the only issue would be burning through an ISP's space very fast, but with IPv6 that's not a huge deal.


Current thread: