nanog mailing list archives
Re: Security gain from NAT
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
I, for one, give up. No matter what you say I will never implement NAT, and you may or may not implement it if people make boxes that support it. Clearly
...This was supposed to be a private reply and was not meant to go to the list. My apologies.
I will also refrain from further responses- something I definitely should have done 20 messages ago... -Don
Current thread:
- Re: Security gain from NAT Roger Marquis (Jun 04)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: Security gain from NAT brett watson (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security gain from NAT Roger Marquis (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Donald Stahl (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Donald Stahl (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Roger Marquis (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Roger Marquis (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Bill Stewart (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Nathan Ward (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Donald Stahl (Jun 05)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Stephen Sprunk (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT David Conrad (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Mark Smith (Jun 06)
- Dead Thread (Re: Security gain from NAT) alex (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: Security gain from NAT Nathan Ward (Jun 06)