nanog mailing list archives
Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:53:54 -0500
I believe that we'll see extensive use of NAT for client-only services (just look at many broadband residential services today), but that won't help business customers who want a block for the DMZ servers.
think a few million /27s or /29s with publicly accessible services on one of those addresses. randy
Current thread:
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan, (continued)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Leo Vegoda (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 26)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan John Curran (Jul 26)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 26)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan John Curran (Jul 26)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 26)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan David Conrad (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan John Curran (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan David Conrad (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Randy Bush (Jul 25)
- RE: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan michael.dillon (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Adrian Chadd (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 25)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Petri Helenius (Jul 28)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Peter Dambier (Jul 29)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Stephen Wilcox (Jul 29)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Peter Dambier (Jul 29)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Scott Francis (Jul 30)
- Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan Peter Dambier (Jul 31)