nanog mailing list archives
Re: How big a network is routed these days?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:38:41 -0500
On 17-Jan-2007, at 18:36, Owen DeLong wrote:
Actually, generally, the expectation under 4.4 is that the addresses will not be advertised at all for the most part, since, generally, there's no need to advertise the route to the exchange point, itself, into the global routing table. 4.4 is intended to support internet exchanges, ala MAEs, etc.
... and operators of critical DNS infrastructure, as the text I quoted indicated. Not much point in numbering a TLD server out of a block that isn't going to be advertised.
In terms of 4.3.2.1 and 4.3.2.2, I believe ARIN has worked very hard to express no expectation or intent about how assignments relate to route advertisements and routing policy.
Indeed, as I believe I mentioned. Joe
Current thread:
- How big a network is routed these days? John Smith (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? sthaug (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? David Freedman (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? Joe Abley (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? Owen DeLong (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? Joe Abley (Jan 17)
- Re: How big a network is routed these days? David Freedman (Jan 17)