![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick BGP peering question
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:46:40 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, James Blessing wrote: > Expecting the traffic is not a problem, just want some way of verifying that the > traffic isn't malicious/spoofed (e.g. by using unicast RPF or similar) Is there some reason a filter wouldn't work? -Bill
Current thread:
- Quick BGP peering question James Blessing (Jan 03)
- RE: Quick BGP peering question Neil J. McRae (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question James Blessing (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question Bill Woodcock (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question Jeff Aitken (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question James Blessing (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question Jeff Aitken (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question Bill Woodcock (Jan 03)
- Re: Quick BGP peering question Jack Bates (Jan 03)
- RE: Quick BGP peering question Neil J. McRae (Jan 03)