RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

["Bora Akyol" <bora () broadcom com>]

Simon

An additional point to consider is that it takes a lot of effort and
$$$$ to get a channel allocated to your content in a cable network. 

This is much easier when TV is being distributed over the Internet.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On 
> Behalf Of Simon Lockhart
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:42 PM
> To: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a 
> day, continuously?
>
>
> On Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 07:52:02AM +0000, 
> Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
> > Given that the broadcast model for streaming content
> > is so successful, why would you want to use the
> > Internet for it? What is the benefit?
>
> How many channels can you get on your (terrestrial) broadcast 
> receiver?
>
> If you want more, your choices are satellite or cable. To get 
> cable, you 
> need to be in a cable area. To get satellite, you need to 
> stick a dish on 
> the side of your house, which you may not want to do, or may 
> not be allowed
> to do.
>
> With IPTV, you just need a phoneline (and be close enough to 
> the exchange/CO
> to get decent xDSL rate). In the UK, I'm already delivering 
> 40+ channels over
> IPTV (over inter-provider multicast, to any UK ISP that wants it).
>
> Simon