nanog mailing list archives
RE: Question about SLAs
From: "Fox,Thomas" <tfox () expertsmi com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:36:47 -0500
The other nice thing about small claims is that the judgment is just as "real" and enforceable as those from the big boy courts. About 10 or so years ago, we got into a dispute with a carrier where we co-lo'd some equipment. Went to small claims court, got a judgment of a few thousand dollars, didn't get paid.... So we went down on a Friday afternoon to the co-lo (this was in Toledo, so there was some interim step we had to do to make the judgment enforceable across state lines, but I don't recall what the step was), let ourselves and the sheriff in with our access code, and started unhooking some Cisco gear that belonged to the carrier. We had a check in about 2 hours. :-)
And the nice thing about small claims court, if you meet the maximum limit of course, is that large companies often are lazy about dealing with the claims. If you are smaller than them, judges will often grant you a judgment when the big company doesn't show. At that point, with a court judgment in hand, it is easier to get the carrier's attention.
--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Current thread:
- Re: Question about SLAs, (continued)
- Re: Question about SLAs Joseph S D Yao (Feb 09)
- RE: Question about SLAs Barry Shein (Feb 09)
- RE: Question about SLAs Fergie (Feb 08)
- RE: Question about SLAs michael.dillon (Feb 09)
- RE: Question about SLAs Fox,Thomas (Feb 09)
- Re: Question about SLAs Steve Rubin (Feb 09)
- Re: Question about SLAs Deepak Jain (Feb 09)
- Re: Question about SLAs Todd Vierling (Feb 11)
- RE: Question about SLAs Barry Shein (Feb 09)
- RE: Question about SLAs michael.dillon (Feb 09)
- RE: Question about SLAs Fox,Thomas (Feb 09)