nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:18:07 -0800


Randy Bush wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
equipment makers (as much as randy hates them)

excuse?!?!?  that is unjustified and uncalled for.

vendors, like everyone else, will do what is in their best interests.
as i am an operator, not a vendor, that is often not what is in my best
interest, marketing literature aside.  i believe it benefits the ops
community to be honest when the two do not seem to coincide.

If the ops community doesn't provide enough addresses and a way to use
them then the vendors will do the same thing they did in v4. It's not
clear to me where their needs don't coincide in this case.

there are three legs to the tripod

        network operator

        user

        equipment manufacturer

They have (or should have) a mutual interest in:

        Transparent and automatic configuration of devices.

        The assignment of globally routable addresses to internet
        connected devices

        the user having some control over what crosses the boundry
        between their network and the operators.


randy



Current thread: