nanog mailing list archives
Re: SC vs other connectors, optical budgets decreasing (was Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:13:34 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Alex Pilosov wrote:
wiring system is getting larger. Given the specified SC connector insertion loss of .75dB, it is not uncommon to see loss within a facility
Where does this .75 dB figure come from? Googling around seems to yield .15-.5 with a typical around .2. .75 sounds very high.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE, (continued)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Leigh Porter (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Justin M. Streiner (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Wayne E. Bouchard (Dec 14)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Chris Cole (Dec 14)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Deepak Jain (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 12)
- SC vs other connectors, optical budgets decreasing (was Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE) Alex Pilosov (Dec 12)
- Re: SC vs other connectors, optical budgets decreasing (was Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE) Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Deepak Jain (Dec 12)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 12)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 12)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Chris Cole (Dec 13)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Stephen Sprunk (Dec 13)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Owen DeLong (Dec 13)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Chris Cole (Dec 13)
- Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 13)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Chris Cole (Dec 13)
- RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE Chris Cole (Dec 13)