nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc org>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:12:19 +1100 (EST)
I think we got here when "site-local" went away - we've effectively redefined link-local to mean "site-local," while using globally unique addressing.
site-local was replaced with ULA. Have you got your ULA yet? :-) ULA gives you /48's. 6to4 gives you /48's. Your customers already have /48's whether they know it or not (and some do). Mark
Current thread:
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers, (continued)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Joe Greco (Dec 24)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Joe Greco (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Leigh Porter (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Jeroen Massar (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Paul Jakma (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Florian Weimer (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Chris Adams (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers David Barak (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Andrews (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Joe Greco (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Smith (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Randy Bush (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Smith (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Jeroen Massar (Dec 21)