nanog mailing list archives
RE: An informal survey... round II
From: "tariq biziou" <tariq.biziou () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:57:11 -0400
Why should we announce tiny recycled blocks? If there is a /16 in the swamp in which half the space is free but its all /24's, why wouldn't wouldn't we allocate all the free /24's to a single entity and instruct the entity to announce it as a "holey" /16? The existing /24 holders will override (punch holes in) the /16 for their /24's.And when they withdraw the more specific or you glop them together in your fib in the name of agregation a 3rd party gets all their traffic? I'm sure that will work really well.Only the next hop. The game to play is "I want to dump traffic to a neighboring AS who has more a chance of getting it to its relevant destination." Partial routes (eg, filtering on say a /24 boundary with a default route) already sort of gives you that.
this idea has been flawed from the beginning: 1. prefix length indicates neither network capacity nor volume of traffic 2. most people prefer not to pay for traffic that is neither theirs nor a customer's -- --tariq
Current thread:
- Re: An informal survey... round II Brandon Butterworth (Aug 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: An informal survey... round II tariq biziou (Aug 31)