nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:23:12 +0200
On 26-aug-2007, at 7:56, John Osmon wrote:
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be talked out of it rather easily.
Why would you want to do that?I've been tempted to do it the other way around, though. In a hosting environment, you can end up with a bunch of /24s dumped on a broadcast domain with a number of different customers but the addresses so intermingled that you can't give each customer their own VLAN. With IPv6, there is enough address space to give each customer a VLAN and and address block to go along with that, which is a lot cleaner.
Current thread:
- IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 25)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)
- DECNet Good Old Days (spun from ...network boundaries...) James R. Cutler (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Kevin Oberman (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John van Oppen (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Martin Hannigan (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)