nanog mailing list archives
Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:55:55 +0100 (BST)
In another mailing list, someone has asserted that "noone believes router vendors who say [they can support 2M routes today and 10M with no change in technology]".
Haven't we gone over the CPU speed argument recently enough?
Do you believe router vendors who state they today have "capacities on the order of 2 million ipv4 routes and they have no reason to expect that they couldn't deliver 10 million route FIB products in a few years given sufficient demand."?
Pointless argument, wait and see as it doesn't matter. If they do then we're fine. If they don't then we won't have that many routes so it won't be a problem.
- where do you believe existing routing technology will fall down?
If people sit watching the train crash rather than take avoiding action
- what steps will you take/are you taking to limit your vulnerability?
As long as I can afford as big a RP as the next ISP we're fine. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey., (continued)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 25)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. David W. Hankins (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. John A. Kilpatrick (Aug 26)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Adrian Chadd (Aug 26)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Simon Leinen (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Adrian Chadd (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Adrian Chadd (Aug 26)
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Ross Callon (Aug 26)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. David Conrad (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Rob Evans (Aug 28)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. bmanning (Aug 28)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Brandon Butterworth (Aug 25)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Randy Bush (Aug 25)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Jared Mauch (Aug 25)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain (Aug 25)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Florian Weimer (Aug 26)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain (Aug 26)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Eric Gauthier (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Jon Lewis (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. David Conrad (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain (Aug 27)
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Randy Bush (Aug 25)