nanog mailing list archives
Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy...
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 15 Aug 2007 16:29:53 -0000
So, if they charged a $ 1 "return fee," they would either
It needn't even be that much. Bob Parsons of Godaddy has proposed that the 22 cent ICANN fee be non-refundable, an approach that has the advantage that it removes any incentive by registrars or registries to encourage tasting so they can keep the penalty money. The .ORG registry asked last year for permission to charge 5 cents per deletion to any registrar that deletes more than 90% of their registrations. The ICANN board approved it last November, so we should be able to get some actual data about what difference it made, although I am unable to find any reports on the PIR web site more recent than last October. Regards, John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
Current thread:
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy..., (continued)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Dorn Hetzel (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Dorn Hetzel (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Andrew Sullivan (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Warren Kumari (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Marshall Eubanks (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... John Levine (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Marshall Eubanks (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... John L (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... william(at)elan.net (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Dorn Hetzel (Aug 16)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Marshall Eubanks (Aug 14)