nanog mailing list archives

Re: [ppml] too many variables

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:17:25 +0800


On Tue, Aug 14, 2007, Leo Bicknell wrote:

Of course, I think if the RE were an external 2RU PC that they sold
for $5,000 (which is still highway robbery) ISP's might upgrade
more than once every 10 years....


Sounds like an experiment. Anyone have a spare J M40?

(*duck*)





Adrian

Current thread:

Re: [ppml] too many variables, (continued)
- - - Message not available
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Eliot Lear (Aug 13)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 13)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Eliot Lear (Aug 13)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Cat Okita (Aug 13)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Barry Shein (Aug 15)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Scott Whyte (Aug 13)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 14)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Adrian Chadd (Aug 14)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables sthaug (Aug 14)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Bruce M Simpson (Aug 24)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Paul Vixie (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Paul Vixie (Aug 10)
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 10)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables Joel Jaeggli (Aug 13)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
    - Message not available
    - RE: [ppml] too many variables michael.dillon (Aug 12)