nanog mailing list archives

Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy...


From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:58:24 +0000 (GMT)




On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, William Herrin wrote:

Chris,

Suggestion B in ICANN's information request was:

"making the ICANN annual transaction fee (currently 0.20 USD per year)
apply to names deleted during the [5-day Add Grace Period],"

Wouldn't this essentially end the bad-behavior domain tasting without
hurting grandma-jones with her typo?

This would incur a 20 cent/domain fee for return of the domain inside the
grace period, yes? that would add a slow drain to the taster's
pocketbooks, is that slow-drain enough to make tasting less profitable? or
'not profitable'?  If so, then yes probably it'd slow tasting or end it.
I don't think that a 'processing fee' is abnormal on returned items so
that  might even sit well enough with grandma-jones (in my example).

And if it was still profitable to taste domain names, wouldn't it pump
so much money into ICANN that they could lower the annual fees for the
rest of us?

hey lookie, a nice side effect :)


Current thread: