nanog mailing list archives
Re: [ppml] too many variables
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:24:58 -1000
the fib in a heavily peered dfz router does not often converge now. the question is when will the router not be able to process the volume of churn, i.e. fall behind further and further? as there is non-trivial headroom in the algorithms, moore's law on the processors, etc. etc., your message is as operationally meaningful as dave and john telling us they can handle 2m prefixes today. randy
Current thread:
- too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Patrick Giagnocavo (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Leigh Porter (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Steve Atkins (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Lucy Lynch (Aug 09)
- Message not available
- Re: too many variables Patrick Giagnocavo (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables Leigh Porter (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: too many variables bmanning (Aug 09)