![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T?
From: Michael Airhart <mairhart () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:06:07 -0500
I can't speak for Cisco or Cisco IT, but as evidenced by this email, at least part of our connectivity is up.
No doubt someone official is looking at it as we speak. (I'll just lurk Nanog to get the skinny)..
A brief look at routeviews shows www.cisco.com (198.133.219.25) originating from AS109 (Cisco) and transiting via AS7132 (AT&T/SBC) and AS7018 (AT&T). Thus I suspect this is an issue with AS109 (Cisco) and not with their providers. Though, I do feel wrong using the plural "providers" in this case... -Benson >
Current thread:
- Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Paul Ferguson (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Koch, Christian (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? David Coulson (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Wil Schultz (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Wil Schultz (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Koch, Christian (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? [POWER UPDATE] J. Oquendo (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Wil Schultz (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Marcus H. Sachs (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Schliesser, Benson (Aug 08)
- Message not available
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Michael Airhart (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Schliesser, Benson (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Schliesser, Benson (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Koch, Christian (Aug 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Paul Ferguson (Aug 08)
- Re: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Tuc at T-B-O-H (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Scott Weeks (Aug 08)
- RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? Lasher, Donn (Aug 08)