nanog mailing list archives
RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:54:58 +0100
And I know a company that has been using 1/8, 2/8, 3/8,4/8, 5/8, 6/8,7/8 and 8/8 for many years, also behind NAT or onnon-Internet connectednetworks. But that is not what I am talking about here.... And what happens if the legitimate owners of those already allocated start advertising routes for them on the public Internet, or IANA decides to release some of those not already allocated? Those NATs, if single-NAT'ed, will find themselves unable to reach those resources.
In general, there is simply no Internet connectivity for devices on these networks. Not eeven LAN connectivity.
In fact, I think I have seen some of those on the public Internet, I could be wrong.
But it is not a military application so who knows what some of the end users have done with their workstations. There is all kinds of wierd stuff out there. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8, (continued)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 David Conrad (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Paul Vixie (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Rob Thomas (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jeroen Massar (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Scott Morris (Apr 16)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 17)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Daniel Senie (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Tony Finch (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Stephen Stuart (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Joseph S D Yao (Apr 16)