nanog mailing list archives
Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:35:46 -0400
On 15-Apr-2007, at 06:38, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
With IPv6, there's of course still manual configuration, but PPP is out because it can't negotiate IPv6 addresses.
I've heard you say this a few times now, but I am also told by various people in various places that they have succeeded in getting IPv6 addresses assigned using PPPoE. Colour me confused.
Does RFC 2472 have some practical limitations in the real world that I haven't noticed? Or is the problem a simple matter of implementation?
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Joel Jaeggli (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Gian Constantine (Apr 10)
- Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)
- DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 12)
- Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground David W. Hankins (Apr 13)
- Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 15)
- Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Joe Abley (Apr 15)
- Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 15)
- Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground Adrian Chadd (Apr 15)