nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () center osis gov>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:34:54 -0400
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0100, michael.dillon () bt com wrote: ...
Yes there are. The current whois returns way more information on a query than you need for network operations. That's because the current whois was designed back in the 1970's so that ARPANET network managers could identify all the users of the network in order to help them make the business case for their budget requests to cover the cost of high-speed 56k frame relay links.
Mike, that's twice in two days that you've made that assertion. I don't remember any financial administrator in those days that would have accepted WHOIS output as justification for anything. I do remember, however, that those "high-speed" 9600 baud and 56Kb links were point-to- point and went down a lot. And so what I remember the WHOIS entries being used for was: ...
In my opinion, the purpose and scope of such a directory is to provide contact info for people who are ready, willing and able to communicate regarding network operations and interconnect issues and who are able to act on that communication. All contact info should be verified with the contactee who must EXPLICITLY agree to have the info published. All contact info will be verified periodically (maybe every 4 months?) by out-of band means, i.e. the directory operator will keep track of individual email addresses and phone numbers for role account managers.
... so that we could contact the person at the other end who was responsible for and knowledgable of their side of the network connection, to fix it. At o-dark-thirty, if necessary. Unfortunately, the way WHOIS is maintained these days, this can no longer be trusted. Note: at the time, I was a bit younger and did not often encounter financial managers, so it's possible some might have accepted WHOIS output. But most people thought computers were some weird thing out THERE [point in random direction], and would sooner have accepted a hand-written note than one printed on a TTY33 or chain printer. -- Joe Yao Analex Contractor
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks J. Oquendo (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Peter Dambier (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Message not available
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Stephen Satchell (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 10)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)