nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:09:28 -0400
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:50:34PM +0000, Fergie wrote:
I would have to respectfully disagree with you. When network operators do due diligence and SWIP their sub-allocations, they (the sub-allocations) should be authoritative in regards to things like RBLs.
After thinking it over: I partly-to-mostly agree. In principal, yes. In practice, however, [some] negligent network operators have built such long and pervasive track records of large-scale abuse that their allocations can be classified into two categories: 1. Those that have emitted lots of abuse. 2. Those that are going to emit lots of abuse. In such cases, I'm not inclined to wait for (2) to become reality. ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Fergie (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks william(at)elan.net (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks william(at)elan.net (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris L. Morrow (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 13)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Steve Sobol (Apr 13)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks william(at)elan.net (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Rich Kulawiec (Apr 11)
- Message not available
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 11)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 11)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Leigh Porter (Apr 12)
- Message not available
- RE: Limiting email abuse by subscribers [was: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks] Frank Bulk (Apr 12)