nanog mailing list archives
Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:34:47 +0300
Kradorex Xeron wrote:
Sadly, if blocking ports and protocols becomes the only method to control things like this from occurring, I sadly will have to agree with Pete's post, as soon we're going to have all 65535 ports on all protocols (TCP, UDP, etc) blocked.
65536 ports for UDP... Pete
Current thread:
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names, (continued)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Chris L. Morrow (Apr 02)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Gadi Evron (Apr 02)
- New domain name registry rules (was: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names) michael.dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: New domain name registry rules (was: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names) Jim Popovitch (Apr 03)
- Message not available
- RE: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- RE: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Jim Popovitch (Apr 07)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Simon Lyall (Apr 01)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Douglas Otis (Apr 01)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Petri Helenius (Apr 01)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Gadi Evron (Apr 01)
- Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names Andy Davidson (Apr 03)
- Blocking mail from bad places michael.dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: Blocking mail from bad places Thomas Leavitt (Apr 03)
- Re: Blocking mail from bad places Ken Simpson (Apr 03)
- Re: Blocking mail from bad places Chris Owen (Apr 03)
- Re: Blocking mail from bad places Thomas Leavitt (Apr 03)