nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?
From: Elijah Savage <esavage () digitalrage org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:54:31 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message ----- From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> To: nanog () merit edu Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:17:01 PM GMT-0500 Subject: Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? On Sep 18, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Elijah Savage wrote:
I've been directed to put all of the internal hosts and such into the public DNS zone for a client.
Another option is split-horizon DNS for the internal stuff, if it never needs to be publicly visible.
Yes, that's what views will give you. You have an internal view only your vpn and lan users can see. Then you have a public view for all others that do not mix. All can be run on the same servers vice having 2 external and 2 internal name servers and also without having to run multiple instances of bind.
Current thread:
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil?, (continued)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Simon Waters (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Michael Nicks (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Joe Maimon (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Fred Baker (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Gadi Evron (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Fred Baker (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Peter J. Cherny (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Peter Dambier (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Elijah Savage (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Roland Dobbins (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Elijah Savage (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Roland Dobbins (Sep 18)
- Re: Why is RFC1918 space in public DNS evil? Simon Waters (Sep 18)