Re: ip reclamation was Re: Kremen's Buddy?

["william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>]

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Scott Weeks wrote:

> ----- Original Message Follows -----
> From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
>
> > Le 2006-09-12 à 15:10, <andrew2 () one net>
> <andrew2 () one net>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > It makes me wonder just how much space like that there
> > > is out there artifically increasing IP scarcity.
> >
> > The fact that there is a lot of space assigned/allocated
> > and not used   in any easily observable way is well known
> > to those who track the   address exhaustion issue, I
> > think.
>
>
> How much, though, is used, but not routed publically?

-----------------------
TOTAL FOR IPV4 BLOCKS:

Allocated: 9302367 (/24 blocks) - 63%
Not Allocated: 5377697 (/24 blocks) - 37%
Currently Routed: 6183529 (/24 blocks) - 42%
Not Routed: 8496535 (/24 blocks) - 58%
-----------------------
Simple math from above:
 Allocated & Not Routed: 3118838 (/24 blocks) - 21%

This is from my data available at www.completewhois.com/statistics/
(which is for some reason partially broken right now - has all the
correct data but coloring of bars did not happen). The percent 
calculation does not include class-d and class-e (i.e. only blocks
0/8 - 223/8 are counted).

> Something that has been brought up from time to time here.
> It's not easily observable, but allowed.

Not easily observable means some ip blocks maybe used but are not 
adverised in public BGP. This is a bit of an issue with certain
part of US Gov.

> scott

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william () elan net