nanog mailing list archives

Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback?


From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () center osis gov>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:59:22 -0400


On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:18:59PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
...
      Even if you assume that allocations made by ARIN are not property, it's
hard to argue that pre-ARIN allocations are not. They're not subject to
revocation and their grant wasn't conditioned on compliance with policies.
...


I don't understand how you can assert this.  Use of IP addresses follows
the current policies, whatever they are.  They have no grandfathered
rights.

Oops, here I am sounding like I know something about lawyering.  ;-)  I
think we all need to either wait for the results, or if so moved, send
in amicus curiae briefs.  Not a lot else we can do, since few if any of
us are lawyers, except pray that the judge is enlightened.


-- 
Joe Yao
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.


Current thread: