nanog mailing list archives
Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:46:26 -0500
I can't believe grown engineers are afraid of a dot.
they are not. but they have enough free time on their hands to endlessly discuss a dot. randy
Current thread:
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..., (continued)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... william(at)elan.net (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael . Dillon (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Henk Uijterwaal (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael . Dillon (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Henk Uijterwaal (Oct 10)
- AW: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Gunther Stammwitz (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Larry Blunk (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Edward Lewis (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... shields (Oct 10)
- 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Geoff Huston (Oct 10)
- Re: 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Hank Nussbacher (Oct 11)
- Re: 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Geoff Huston (Oct 11)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Douglas Otis (Oct 11)