nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICMP & PathMTU
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:05:49 +0200
* Jim Popovitch:
Two questions for everybody...(any and all responses appreciated, even if the reply mentions botnets or hammers ;-) ) 1) What value is ICMP if everybody pretty much considers it's accuracy suspect?
The problem with ICMP-based traceroutes is that it doesn't necessarily test the path you are interested in. Use tcptraceroute or traceproto instead. Of course, this doesn't solve the problem that TTL Exceeded messages might be generated with very low priority, which is in generally a very good idea.
2) How does ICMP's suspect nature affect Path MTU?
In this case, you're interested in the ICMP payload, not the fact whether an ICMP packet goes through or not. (You lose if someone filters ICMP, though.)
Current thread:
- Re: Extreme Slowness, (continued)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Elijah Savage (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Aaron Glenn (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Elijah Savage (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Elijah Savage (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Elijah Savage (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Elijah Savage (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Jeremy Chadwick (Oct 26)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Michael . Dillon (Oct 27)
- Re: Extreme Slowness Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 27)
- ICMP & PathMTU (was: Re: Extreme Slowness) Jim Popovitch (Oct 26)
- Re: ICMP & PathMTU (was: Re: Extreme Slowness) Randy Bush (Oct 26)
- Re: ICMP & PathMTU Florian Weimer (Oct 27)