nanog mailing list archives
RE: Collocation Access
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:43:37 +0100 (BST)
What I've never understood is, that, how a gov't issue ID (for the purposes of allowing entry) is of any use whatsoever. It's not as if someone is doing a instand background check to know if the person is a criminal, or wanted, or whatever. It's trivial to forge a gov't ID.
Welcome to token security. There's lots of silly procedures around now that add nothing to security but someone in an office dreamt them up as they have to be seen to be doing something. If you point out how dumb they are you're a terrorist too. So we al waste time following them (they can't reduce them as if something did happen they'd be blamed, who wants less security?) Colos full of rent-a-cops are just as bad, my passport says who I'm allowed to surrender it to and that doesn't include colo guards yet some want to retain it whilst you're on site. Company ID isn't acceptable to some of them either. I'd rather not trust them with either though I don't mind them looking. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access, (continued)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Mike Hughes (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Mike Hughes (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Jay Hennigan (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Alex Rubenstein (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access John Curran (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Provo (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Control Gadi Evron (Oct 24)
- RE: Collocation Access Brandon Butterworth (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Nick Thompson (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Steve Gibbard (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Frank Coluccio (Oct 24)