nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns - golog
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () renesys com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:35:25 -0400
At 06:53 PM 10/19/2006, Thomas Leavitt wrote: Hi Thomas! [ snip ]
... finally, why go through all this hassle for what has to be an utterly trivial amount of money resulting from people being presented with something totally unexpected and clicking on a link therein... how valuable are these people as customers? I can't imagine much...
> a) is there enough revenue here to consider? This isn't something that's so easy to determine, but golog and others must have a financial model in order to be pursuing it. Here's a visionary article related to this topic, but at the root server level, even more of a delicate issue, but with the same principles as the one we're discussing: http://www.circleid.com/posts/techies_wanna_do_policy/ And this article shows the convenience of falling back on standards when they serve your purpose: http://www.circleid.com/posts/paul_vixie_on_fort_nocs/ YMMV: Best Regards, Martin -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574 Member of Technical Staff Network Operationshannigan () renesys com
Current thread:
- dns - golog Luke Besson (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Simon Waters (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Niels Bakker (Oct 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: dns - golog Rod Ed (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Thomas Leavitt (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Simon Waters (Oct 20)
- Re: dns - golog Thomas Leavitt (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 21)