nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon PSTN continued
From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:45:41 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Wallace Keith wrote:Working with 2 other carriers on a similar issue, response I rec'd was congestion due to automated political dialers. Not sure if I believe that or not...you'd think they'd have systems monitoring that and trimming down the 'fat'? or can they do that? (legally I mean, sorta like QOS for the phone network I suppose)
- ------------------------ I guess it depends on the type of VoIP deployment. http://www.softarmor.com/wgdb/docs/draft-camarillo-sipping-sbc-funcs-02.txt regards, /virendra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFUX0VpbZvCIJx1bcRAqUQAKCwfwsszTIAkMeEtwp0J4g5CxrVIACfYqjD WNcHEZDbB1o344Ck6h91bbk= =b/hK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Verizon PSTN continued David Hubbard (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Jared Mauch (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Steve Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Greg Boehnlein (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Thomas Beecher (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Wallace Keith (Nov 07)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Chris L. Morrow (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued virendra rode // (Nov 07)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Sean Donelan (Nov 09)
- SprintLink peering issue in Chicago? Olsen, Jason (Nov 09)
- Re: SprintLink peering issue in Chicago? Matthew Petach (Nov 09)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Alexander Harrowell (Nov 10)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Chris L. Morrow (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Jared Mauch (Nov 07)