nanog mailing list archives
Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot
From: Stephen Wilcox <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:53 +0000
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:44:11AM -0800, Philip Lavine wrote:
To all, Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet via the same ISP_A. I am using the same AS for both routes. For some reason on my rtr advertising the 2.2.2.2 rte I am unable to see the 1.1.1.1 rte "% Network not in table". I know 1.1.1.1 rte is valid it shows up in looking glass and ISP_A has it on the peer 2.2.2.2 recevies full Internet rtes from. Further verification: I add a static rte on 2.2.2.2 rtr to 1.1.1.1 and its routable??? How is this possible? I have the following filters but I removed them and it seems to not make a diff. OUTBOUND - ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 1 deny .* INBOUND - ip as-path access-list 2 permit .*
you will not accept a route with your AS in teh path you can override it (on cisco) with allow-own-as Steve
Current thread:
- problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Philip Lavine (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Bruce Pinsky (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Stephen Wilcox (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Edward B. DREGER (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Stephen Wilcox (Nov 20)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Edward B. DREGER (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Jay Hennigan (Nov 17)
- Re: problem with BGP or I am an Idiot Bruce Pinsky (Nov 17)