nanog mailing list archives
Re: odd hijack
From: "Josh Karlin" <karlinjf () cs unm edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:25:30 -0700
> Wouldn't they want to hijack more specifics to spam? no. see nick feamster's work, and the lightning talk i proxied for him in dallas. randy
Right, you might want to announce less specifics so that you go unnoticed and then you can spam from blocks not in use. I'm just somewhat surprised that they would announce /3's, /6's, and /7's and be so incredibly obvious about it rather than actually be covert and just announce a few more specifics that likely noone would notice. But I guess at this point they're still not being caught so why worry. Josh
Current thread:
- odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack steve (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Nick Feamster (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Nick Feamster (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)