nanog mailing list archives
Re: adviCe on network security report
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:46:02 +0100
On Thursday 02 Nov 2006 14:54, you wrote:
I'm thinking for every answered message sent to abuse (non autoresponder), one will likely see more than 7-10 failures.
It is a self fulfilling issue. Those abuse desks who deal with the issues you rarely end up writing to, those who don't, you inevitably end up writing to. Which is why you get a better response when raising a new issue, or a small issue, with someone who hasn't been notified of it before. Broach a big established problem like pointing out that Telecom Italia is one of the worse spewers of advance fee fraud emails on the Internet, and you can't get anyone to take an interest. If there were anyone who cared, they would have done something about it by now. Even the Italian government doesn't seem to care about that one. rfc-ignorant.org exists for a reason.
Current thread:
- Re: adviCe on network security report J. Oquendo (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Gadi Evron (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Simon Waters (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: adviCe on network security report Dave Rand (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Sean Donelan (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Dave Rand (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Robert Boyle (Nov 02)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Sean Donelan (Nov 03)
- Re: adviCe on network security report Robert Boyle (Nov 02)