nanog mailing list archives
Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:57:36 -0500 (CDT)
From owner-nanog () merit edu Thu May 11 12:41:20 2006 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:22 -0400 From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:40 -0400 From: David Farber <dave () farber net> To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] ICANN rejects .xxx domain Begin forwarded message: As reported in: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/print?id=1947950 ICANN has reversed their earlier preliminary approval, and has now rejected the "dot-xxx" adult materials top-level domain. I applaud this wise decision by ICANN, which should simultaneously please both anti-porn and free speech proponents, where opposition to the TLD has been intense, though for totally disparate reasons. Nick's AP piece referenced above notes that there are still Congressional efforts to mandate such a TLD. It is important to work toward ensuring that these do not gain traction.Why? If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
And _that_ is *precisely* "why not". <grin> When you figure out _how_ to accomplish the 'and' part of your statement, *world-wide*, and _how_long_ it would take to do so, *AND*CAN*GET*UNIVERSAL* *AGREEMENT* about what has to be inside the coral(sic), well, then, and -only- then can one consider 'what _useful_ purpose' such a TLD would serve. Note also: attempting to impose additional restrictions on _existant_, registered domains would likely constitute breach of contract. With big liabilities attached -- look at what the hijacking of 'sex.com' ended up costing the registrar that let it happen. Restricting future domain registrations _in_an_exsiting_TLD_ raises a separate can of worms, regarding existing registry operator and registrar contracts.
Current thread:
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain, (continued)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Eric Brunner-Williams (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Greg Taylor (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Warren Kumari (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Matt Ghali (May 13)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Derek J. Balling (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Todd Vierling (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Peter Dambier (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Bill Stewart (May 15)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Barry Shein (May 12)