nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP for Abuse Desk


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:56:40 -0400

On Tue, 30 May 2006 20:51:55 CDT, you said:

  3d) Make sure your ToS allows nuking a spamming/abusive host.
  3e) Then *use* that clause in the ToS when needed.

Each of the ISP's I worked for had such a clause.  I felt it
was a double edged sword.  The only choices were to use it or
not to use it, and on non-clear cut cases the business side of
a company may be reluctant to heave a paying customer out the
door.  I would advocate service contracts that allow a graduated
response including, but not limited to, getting rid of the 
customer.  That way, there are penalties available even in cases
of "unintentional" network abuse.  

As I said, "when needed".  As you correctly noted, sometimes it's
more helpful to the bottom line if it remains an unmentioned stick
while you find a carrot to wave at the customer.   If a well-phrased
phone call or two and a helpfully informative e-mail can get the problem
resolved, you obviously didn't *need* to nuke. :)

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: