nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fwd: 41/8 announcement


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:03:19 -0400

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:31 -0000, Peter Corlett said:
I can sort of see the point in ULAs, although if you want a globally unique
address, why not just use a public address?

Maybe you don't *want* a public address. In fact, I *know* sometimes you
don't want one - because you *tell* us you don't:

I tend to pick out random /24s from 172.16/12 when I need private addresses.
Virtually nobody uses those, which makes them most suitable.

Sounds to me like you've just re-invented the ULA for IPv4.  This same
usage case (plus the collision issue you mentioned) are *exactly* why ULA's
were pushed...

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: