nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geo location to IP mapping
From: Charles Cala <charles_cala () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
--- Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com> wrote:
I seriously doubt this would work to better than the regional area. My zip code (20124) region is about 5 km across, which would be 15 microseconds in vacuum, and maybe at most 50 micro seconds in glass. So, you would need accuracies at the 10's of microsecond level to specify zip codes.
don't forget, cable paths are not direct, and each bend in the cable increases the distance that the light must travel within the fiber. optical repeaters, optical switches and other equipment can add distance, (thus time) to the signal. Please see http://www.fiber-optics.info/fiber-history.htm
Current thread:
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping, (continued)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Michael . Dillon (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Alain Hebert (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping sgorman1 (May 15)
- network triangulation (Re: Geo location to IP mapping) Edward B. DREGER (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Marshall Eubanks (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Steven M. Bellovin (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping sgorman1 (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Charles Cala (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Marshall Eubanks (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Charles Cala (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Kevin Pawloski (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Michael . Dillon (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Edward B. DREGER (May 16)